“Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life HAS NOT. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades and they’ll give you as MANY TIMES as you want to get the right answer. This doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life.”
This point is, from some angles, correct. It’s true, for example, that there are still “winners” and “losers” in life. It’s true that your teachers and schools do try to give each student ample opportunity to succeed despite the number of times they fail an assignment. Often, if you’re doing poorly enough in a class, you can probably talk your way into extra credit work, re-writes and re-do assignments, and maybe even just arguing for a higher grade. Most of the time, teachers also take participation into account when determining grades, so it’s, theoretically, easy for students to pass a class if they participate and do just enough work to get by.
If we take this quote to heart, we would have to believe, as many people actually do, that school is 100 percent easier than “real life” because school requires little to no effort and has no consequences for poor work. Is this really true, though? How many times have you struggled to pass a class because it’s just not a class that plays to your strengths? How many times have you been behind and tried to catch up and simply failed? Whether people believe it or not, the school system does have the potential to leave students behind, and, unfortunately, it does it all the time. School is as much a part of “real life” as is the job you’ll get when you graduate. You might not have the same responsibilities, but students are struggling with far less specific challenges than those that people face in the work place.
If you’ve ever wondered why your school expects everyone to be good at math or science or English, you’re not alone. Does it really make sense that everyone could be good at everything that the state standards say is important? Does it make sense that if you struggle with Trigonometry, it’s automatically your fault for not applying yourself? I would argue no. Not entirely. Sure, there are students who simply don’t apply themselves. But there are also students who do and fail constantly. There are also students who apply themselves, fail once, and stop trying. Defeat is a discouraging prospect, and once you’ve encountered it once, it’s difficult to believe in yourself – especially when everyone tells you it’s your fault you’re failing. So if you’re one of these students who tries and fails because something is genuinely challenging for you, you’re not alone. I was there in high school, and I still am sometimes. There are things in life (and school) that we simply don’t have a natural aptitude for. Whether it be because we haven’t encountered anything like it before or we can’t quite wrap our heads around how something works, there are things that feel simply impossible to conquer. But have you ever thought about why you’re expected to be good at all of these school standards?
It’s always math and sciences, and history - classes that require memorization - and English reading and writing, which require constant practice and at least some natural talent, that we're required to take and pass. But, in the back of everyone’s mind, or maybe more toward the front, is the question “When will I ever need to know this beyond high school?” When you find yourself asking this question, a lot of times, you won’t be needing it. I can’t say for sure, and no one can, but there are some things that just won’t be useful to you – and by the time it is, you won’t remember it anyway. So why, if I’m graduating with a journalism degree and never took a math or science class in college, would I have needed to excel in math and science when I was in high school? To be perfectly honest, I might not have needed to. I can’t remember one thing from my high school math or science classes, and there hasn’t come a time yet when I’ve needed to. Yes, it’s good to be well-rounded and immersed into a variety of subjects to make sure that every student has a chance to pursue his or her passions, but, at the end of the day, if someone spends their entire high school career failing math, are they likely to ever pursue a career remotely related to math? Absolutely not. People like what they’re good at, and they pursue what they like.
On the flip side, how many people do you know who are bad at art – just awful – can’t even draw a decent-looking house? I can name quite a few (myself included). But were we ever told in high school that we were inadequate or that we were going to fail a class because of our ineptitude in the arts? As a matter of fact, how long do we actually have to take arts classes? I elected to take band and choir, and even an art class because I thought I’d give it a try, but I was only required to take choir until ninth grade and art only one year in eighth grade. Band was taken entirely by choice and never required. So what does this tell us? Personally, it tells me that the school system values the sciences, math, and reading and writing much more than it does other subjects that fall in the “arts” category. Even language classes were electives after taking a language for about three years. This tells me that whether students are good or bad at the arts, it doesn’t matter, but having an aptitude (or lack thereof) in “required” classes will make or break them. Does this seem fair to you?
I could argue all day that schools put too much stock in a broad curriculum compared to the curriculum of life. Because, honestly, when do you need to know how to identify rock types unless that’s the profession you choose? However, you can’t figure out what you want and love to do if you don’t experience as many options as possible before choosing a college or career path or both. So this central curriculum that we all hate so much – while overstated – is necessary. The way that students are graded in these classes, though, is another story. In art classes, almost entire grades are based on participation and attempts to complete projects. So why are math and science different? What if, instead of docking points for every wrong answer, students were just shown why their method of solving a problem was wrong and how they might improve for next time? If real effort is there – if students take the time to complete assignments and just don’t get the answers right because of a failure to understand a concept – should people be penalized for their ineptitudes? Unfortunately, they are, and students will probably continue to be penalized for wrong answers regardless of how hard they worked to get them right. To students, this means that you need to try as hard as possible to get the grades you deserve. Just because you’re not good at something doesn’t mean you can’t get an “A.” Ask teachers for help, try memorization strategies, study as long as it takes, and do all of the homework twice, if necessary. This is a tall order, and it’s not something that will happen easily, but if you want to succeed in a system that isn’t working for you, you need to do the work yourself.
So to Sykes, and anyone else who believes that school is easy compared to “real life” because of the opportunities students are given to succeed, I say no; no, it is not easy. Sure, there are easy aspects. There are classes that people are good at and do well in, but there are also classes that make it impossible for students to keep their grades up. I do agree, though, that school “doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance” to “real life.” In “real life,” we have the opportunity to only do something we love for the rest of our lives and avoid everything we’re bad at. We have the chance to spend our professional lives doing math if that’s what we’re good at. If we want to write and avoid math and science as much as possible, we really can – not one person in a job interview or on the job has ever asked me to solve a math problem. If we want to be musicians and never write another MLA style essay again, we can. The fact of the matter is in “real life,” we don’t get graded for doing poorly on something we don’t understand. We get paid for doing something we chose to do. So the next time you find yourself failing and losing hope, just remember: if you can make it through high school, you stand a great chance of making it through life. Because “real life” can be so much easier just because of the control you’ll have over your own path.
In the same breath, though, I have to say that this control comes with much more responsibility. Yes, you have the opportunity to only do what you want to do, professionally, and so it is easier to succeed in “real life” in this respect. But keep in mind that making it through high school and knowing what you want to do won’t be enough. It’s going to take so much more to succeed than determination and talent. As I said in my previous post, life isn’t fair, and it’s up to you to keep pursuing your goals despite that fact. You’ll face financial hardships, challenges in the work place, difficulties actually getting a job, and so many more obstacles after leaving high school, so, in many ways, real life is so much more difficult than school. But what I think can sometimes be forgotten is that these challenges are meant to be age-appropriate.
When we graduate high school, we’re supposed to be ready for professional life, but we’re spending our days being graded on things that we just aren’t good at and won’t need to be good at rather than learning actual life skills or just being exposed to what our futures might hold. For me, it’s difficult to think of high school as easy simply because we face so many challenges that we might not be able to completely overcome because of our skills. We might not be ready to make the decisions that will shape our futures, but we’re required to make them nonetheless with only high school as a measuring stick against which to judge our academic abilities and our professional options. So, for me, high school was exceedingly difficult at times. When trying to get through classes that were particularly challenging and that I couldn’t get an “A” in no matter how hard I tried, I couldn’t wait for “real life” to start. But then again, once I started making decisions that would determine what that life would look like, it became apparent that I wasn’t ready to make those decisions; that’s when high school got so much harder. Instead of worrying about just school or just my career, I had to focus on both, and there are only a few times in life when we’re required to do that and even fewer when we’re actually prepared to do it. It’s a challenge that high school students may or may not be prepared to face, but they have to face it regardless. And this – this challenge to determine what your future will hold when all you have to base it on are your successes and failures in high school, which gives little indication of your potential for success – is what can make “real life” easier than school.
-Hope Swedeen
What are your thoughts on the expectations schools have for students? Are students prepared to face the challenge of determining what they want for their futures? Is an emphasis on math and sciences good for all students?